Information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and is in no way intended as legal advice or counsel.

NewsFlash
Updated November 30th, 2005

 

All of this can seem pretty scary.  So, how do the new 2257 regulations affect you as a viewer?

They don't...

...so long as you only like to view adult material for your own private use and aren't redistributing it elsewhere.  If this is the case, you can relax, all of this means nothing to you.

However, under the new laws, anyone who creates, produces or republishes any images accessible for use by US citizens regardless of location of origination, containing actual sexually explicit material is required to maintain appropriate records for all models appearing in said work.

Basically, if you copy a sexually explicit image or video from a web site and post it to another site accessible to a US audience, you become a secondary producer and must obtain and maintain the age verification records for every model in the work.  This includes image attachments to any groups, bulletin boards or anywhere on the web.  These records must then be cross-indexed by URL location and/or title of work, model name and model alias, maintained for up to 7 years and made available for inspection by proper authorities without prior notice during normal business hours.  Any violation of these regulations can carry up to 5 years in prison for a first offense and up to 10 years for each offense thereafter.

But, as stated above, if you are only a casual viewer of legal age and are accessing only legal adult material in an area where such material is allowed for your own private use, you are protected by your First Amendment rights and have no need to worry.  So, enjoy the show!

2257 Stipulated Agreement Extended Again
By: Brad Wiley
Originally posted 11-30-2005 at AVN.com


DENVER, Colo. - A motion was filed in the U.S. District Court of Colorado this afternoon that extends for one month the original stipulated agreement between the parties for a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales.

The extension will terminate December 30, 2005, or until the Court rules on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, whichever occurs first. During that time period, the Justice Department is restrained from inspecting or enforcing U.S.C. 18 § 2257 against plaintiffs in the case, which includes all members of the Free Speech Coalition.

Terms of the original stipulation are once more maintained intact. The Free Speech Coalition would like to thank its members and the adult community for their support and patience during this time period, and also express appreciation to the FSC attorneys for their efforts, and to the U.S. Justice Department for its cooperation.

______________________________

2257 Agreement Extended Again
By: Wade Garrett
Originally posted 10-31-2005 at AVN.com


DENVER - A motion was filed in the U.S. District Court of Colorado this afternoon that extends for one month the original stipulated agreement between the parties for a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales.


The extension will terminate November 30, or until the Court rules on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, whichever occurs first. During that time period, the Justice Department is restrained from inspecting or enforcing U.S.C. 18 § 2257 against plaintiffs in the case, which includes all members of the Free Speech Coalition.

Terms of the original stipulation are once more maintained intact, and it is still the expectation of the attorneys for the Free Speech Coalition that a decision by U.S District Court Judge Walker D. Miller on the Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction will be rendered soon.

“We understand that the adult entertainment community is as eager as we are to have a ruling on our motion for a preliminary injunction,” said FSC Executive Director Michelle L. Freridge, “but sometimes the wheels of justice revolve very slowly, and we simply must be patient. But make no mistake, we are as confident as ever that our arguments challenging these abusive regulations will win out at the end of the day. We appreciate your patience, and look forward to ultimate victory in this significant battle to protect your free speech rights.”

The Free Speech Coalition thanked its members and the adult community for their support, and also expressed appreciation to its first-class free speech attorneys for their efforts, as well as to the U.S. Justice Department for its cooperation working out the details of the extension of the stipulated agreement.

______________________________

Free Speech Coalition and the Department of Justice Reach Agreement Suspending 2257 Enforcement for Plaintiffs and FSC Members

Originally Posted 06/23/2005 at www.freespeechcoalition.com

Denver, Co. - The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) announced today a stipulation between the parties in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales, under which the U.S. Department of Justice agrees that the regulations relating to the federal record-keeping and labeling law, 18 U.S.C. §2257, will not be enforced against plaintiffs and all FSC members until September 7, 2005.

The U.S. District Court in Denver will hold a preliminary injunction hearing on August 8, 2005, after which the judge will determine whether to issue a further injunction.

Specifically, the DoJ will not conduct any inspections or pursue any claims with regard to the plaintiffs and their members, but reserves the right to inspect and prosecute anyone who is not a plaintiff or FSC member.

According to the stipulation, agreed to and issued as an order of the Court today, the DoJ, will submit any entity it intends to inspect to a Special Master who will then check the entity’s name against a sealed and confidential FSC membership list. The Special Master will be appointed by the Court, with the consent of the parties, and will be under a specific obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the FSC membership list.

A master list of members will be submitted to the Special Master on Wednesday June 29, 2005, and will include all FSC members as of 2:00 p.m. pacific standard time, Saturday June 25, 2005.

At no time will the DoJ have direct access to the FSC membership list, which will remain under seal.

______________________________
U.S. Enacts New Adult Industry Regulations.

Recent changes in Federal Regulations due to take effect on June 23, 2005 will have serious repercussions affecting the adult industry.  As a result, you will most likely see many Adult Web Sites shutting down under the pressure of the new laws.

All adult web sites are required to adhere to what is called U.S.C. Title 18 Section 2257.  These regulations were put into place in the early to mid 1990's to help in the fight against child pornography and exploitation by requiring the producers and manufacturers of adult material to maintain records as to the age of each performer appearing in any sexually explicit material.  These regulations, not clearly taking into account the varying aspects of the developing internet, were believed by many to be in need of clarification.  In response to pressure from the political right, the Department of Justice has not only updated but added many new rules to the 2257 regulations.  Challenged by the Adult Industry through the ACLU and the Free Speech Coalition, these new laws are considered to be overly restrictive and unnecessary in the fight against child exploitation. (A .pdf file containing the new 2257 regulations may be viewed here.)  While the Adult Industry is in complete support of the fight against the exploitation of children, it is believed the new laws will prevent responsible adult webmasters from continuing to provide services protected under the First Amendment rights of free speech.

One major concern under the new regulations, is that now all "Secondary Producers" are now required to hold and maintain age verification records for all models appearing in any sexually explicit material.  Basically, this means any web site offering material provided by a third party or offering photos and videos taken from other sources, now has to have age verification documents on file or face up to 10 years in prison for each offense.  Many arguments have been waged against this new rule among which is the privacy rights of the models themselves.  In an age where ID theft is a major concern, not to mention the threat of stalkers, the distribution of a models personal identification is a considerable risk.  It is believed most content providers will not realistically be able or willing to make this information available and therefore force many otherwise responsible web sites out of business all-together.

________________

We at Extreme Boyz are committed to fighting for our rights as citizens in a free society and will continue to provide a quality and responsible internet destination for responsible adults.  As such, we are paid members of the Free Speech Coalition as they act as the voice of the Adult Industry and fight to bring understanding and enlightenment to the law-makers within our government.

If you value your rights to view material as found at Extreme Boyz and wish to not have your freedoms infringed upon, you may wish to make a donation to the Free Speech Coalition, a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting the acceptance of the adult industry in America's business community, and supporting greater public tolerance for freedom of sexual speech.

"Freedom Isn't Free!" - http://www.freespeechcoalition.com

Joe Roberts
Webmaster,
ExtremeBoyz.com

 

Active Member

All members of the Free Speech Coalition as of June 25th fall under the recent ruling preventing the Department of Justice from enforcing the new 2257 regulations pending further review as to their constitutionality and enforceability.

Information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and is in no way intended as legal advice or counsel.